Dining Over the Divide: Viewpoints on Immigration and Society
Introducing the Participants
Stephen, sixty-four, Canvey Island
Profession: Retired underwriter
Political history: Typically Tory, except when he lived in a left-leaning London borough and supported the Social Democratic Party
Amuse bouche: His specialty in insurance was hostage situations: “Everyone always says that insurance is boring, but it’s far from it when you’re discussing rescuing people from South Korea because the DPRK have activated the weapon systems”
Evie, 25, London
Profession: Graduate in psychology
Voting record: In her native land, New Zealand, she supported both progressive parties
Amuse bouche: Eva has worked as a singer on cruise ships; her most extended voyage was six months, which is a significant duration to be at sea
For starters
She: Steve appeared there to have a nice time, to be open
Steve: She came across as a very bright, articulate, nice person
She: I had a caprese salad, pasta with fungi, and a creamy dessert thing, it was very good
The big beef
Eva: He was certainly on the side of immigration being reduced. He thinks that UK residents who are native to the area, not just Caucasian Britons, don’t have as much access to the essential services, because more and more people are arriving. Whereas I just disagree that the figures are that bad
Steve: I’m for qualified migrants, I don’t want to live in a homogeneous, WASP country with tepid ale. But I believe that governments have exploited immigration to fill the jobs they can’t get people to do without raising wages. Wages are suppressed, so taxes have to be kept low, so we are unable to improve services – allocate additional funds on child support, on education, on technology
She: I don’t have that much knowledge of the EU referendum, because I was sixteen and abroad when it occurred. He explained it to me in a new light. He told me about “posted workers” – candidates could arrive in the UK and receive solely the salary of the their nation of origin
Steve: Macron spent 24 months getting the EU to abolish the system; it was reformed in 2018. Before that, migrant laborers coming in were undermining local employees. Under Gordon Brown, it was petroleum staff that were brought in; later it’s been hospitality, agriculture. She understood that, because she’d worked on a cruise ship and said she was paid a lot more than international colleagues
Sharing plate
He: It would be great to have a different energy source, come off of oil. I don’t like pollution, I love the clean air, I appreciate rural areas. We agreed on a lot of that. But I said, “What do you think of Norway?” Their energy revenues skyrocketed after the conflict began, they allocated those funds to build green infrastructure
Eva: So we’re dependent on their petroleum. You can see that’s not a good way to go about things. He was in favour of maintaining domestic drilling for the limited quantity we’ll need in the coming years. I kind of agree with him. We’re still going to use planes. We both think we should be advancing to environmentally friendly options, windfarms and water power
For afters
She: We briefly discussed Islamophobia, though we avoided labeling it. He seemed worried by radical ideologies entering – he did note that a many individuals in Middle Eastern countries were radical, which I didn’t think accurate. I think it’s prejudiced to make judgments based on religion
He: I hail from the East End. I asked her if she’d been to that district, and she said it had been gentrified. Obviously, I would say that: populated by professionals. But when I go down that local market, I appear out of place. People stare at me because it’s become predominantly Islamic. She had a little look at me about that. I used the word “ghetto”. Eva’s got Eastern European roots – she objects to the term, to her it implies poverty. I said, “No, it’s an area that becomes theirs.” I agreed to use a alternative term – maybe community?
She: I feel like Muslim people are really overrepresented in the news outlets as doing things wrong. It seems a little bit racist, or xenophobic
Conclusion
Steve: I think we parted on good terms. We had a embrace at the station
Eva: We both said that we’d had a lovely time