🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of votes added later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible where election day turned out somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year went for the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he does because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on the island with a high participation. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. But no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.